Aamir Khan and the intolerance debate

Somehow, we seem to have lost a sense of proportion and perspective over issues. 

For example our PM is either a dangerous monster or the greatest statesman to have walked the earth. There is nothing in between and no one can discuss anything with the pro and anti Modi groups without taking one of these extreme positions. There is a growing culture of taking up half-truths and parading them as universal facts written on stone, on almost all issues. 

Aamir Khan went overboard with his view on intolerance in India. He may have an opinion on the issue like others, but I do not see any way in which someone’s wife in his social class, Hindu or Muslim, someone who has access to Z level security, can be insecure enough to think of leaving the country. His view indeed contradicted many stands he has taken in the past and the fact that he is superstar in this nation. Probably he should have articulated better.  

Just as I find his statement immature and not really well thought out, I am equally surprised by the reaction to his comment. TV channels are only showing this news, I would like to know how my friends in Chennai are doing now. Or for that matter would Russia take any action against the fighter jet that was downed by Turkey today, but no! 

People on FB and Twitter are angry. He made a statement that has hurt people and others have the right to contradict him, many have rightly done so, probably because many like him a lot. But protesting in front of his house and throwing stones, uninstalling Snapdeal Apps, are these things not going overboard again? Is this issue so big that warrants this kind of action? If so, should we not have similar protests when Sakshi Maharaj for example, repeatedly spouted nonsense? Are those comments not worse for a nation like ours? We talk of “selective” anger, is this not selective “patriotism”? 

I heard people say that all this is tarnishing our image in the world. Let us think of some headlines in foreign newspapers tomorrow. “Indian movie superstar picketed and his posters burnt by protesters because of comment on intolerance” or “Indian ecommerce App ratings go down, as protests against actor who made a comment on intolerance”. Would this be good for the image for India? Are these actions now not justifying what Aamir Khan said? 

Coming back to being selective, Kamal Hassan had also threatened to leave India when Muslim fanatics wanted his movie banned. I did not hear anyone call him anti national? I did not like the movie PK, not because I thought it insulted religion, but because it had a poor script and at times, poor direction. The movie made 300+ crores and that shows we Indians do not mind criticism of our religion and are overall tolerant. But fringe elements protested a lot, I can see some posts on FB today. However “Oh My God” took on religion equally strongly, if not more, but protests were not raised against Paresh Rawal.

We need to think why?

In any case these are actors and not script writers or directors so why target them? Why nothing was said against Raju Hirani, Vidhu Vinod Chopra or Abhijat Joshi? Do we fall for ideological propaganda based upon our own subconscious prejudices, without thinking in a fair manner?

 On the larger debate of intolerance, I think there has been an overreaction and in some cases there were vested political and/or ideological interests. But then, if Nayantara Sehgal is Nehru’s niece, although she does not seem to have enjoyed good relations with the Gandhi family, Anupam Kher’s wife is also a BJP MP. However for many, that seems to have nothing to do with the great actor supporting the current government.

 To dismiss everything as a Congress ploy, saying that everyone has been paid to return awards or speak against real or perceived intolerance is very simplistic and is making the current government lose the battle of perception, because there are genuine people in this lot. The President of India, the Vice President, Gulzar, Raghuram Rajan, Kiran Mazumdar, Narayanmurthy, eminent scientists, writers, directors, retired army men among others have spoken up. Challenging the credibility of some of these people may really backfire as it probably did in Bihar.  Just to set the record straight, even after the Bihar elections, 3 writers have returned awards and we have had the issue with Girish Karnad and now Aamir Khan, so it is not entirely due to politics.

 It is not easy being a PM and being Modi is tougher. However if I were the PM, I would have invited some of these people, maybe Gulzar, Kiran Majumdar, Dibakar Banerjee and an eminent writer, maybe Anupam Kher and Shyam Benegal too for a 30 minute “chai par charcha”. Would have listened to their concerns and views, reassured them and would have posted the discussion on Facebook and Twitter. But that may antagonize the hardcore Hindu vote bank, so Modi has his compulsions and barriers.

 All I am saying is, as citizens, let us try to be a bit more balanced in our views, read and consider all kinds of opinions, know the full truth and not many half-truths and then form our views. Over the years we seem to be becoming too opinionated, harbouring extreme ideas, one way or the other. It need not be either this group or that group and always hating one party or person or the other.

 Nothing is black and white in this world, it is high time we appreciate shades of grey, to off white, light black and so on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanu Weds Manu Returns - Must watch for Kangana, comedy

The plot of "Tanu Weds Manu Returns" is thin and does not have many non sequiturs, but director Anand Rai succeeds exceedingly well yet again, in bringing out the mundane incidents in the day to day lives of the people in the suburbs of India and showcasing them in a very interesting way.

The movie starts with Tanu and Manu settled in the UK, going through serious marital problems. After a hilarious scene with some doctors, Manu ends up in a mental asylum. Tanu comes back to India and gets back to her old fun and carefree lifestyle, even meeting up with her old love interest Raja (Jimmy Shergill).

Later Manu also comes to India and falls for Kusum (also played by Ranaut) and the story moves on alongside sub plots involving the supporting actors. Madhavan underplays his role, as per the demand of the script and delivers a decent performance.

Kangana Ranaut is currently the best mainstream Bollywood actress(I did not say heroine).

Deepika Padukone is working hard and was impressive in Piku. Vidya Balan is very capable but she has lost her fizz and needs to cut a lot of flab. The likes of Priyanka Chopra and Alia Bhat among others are all decent, but they have a lot of catching up to do after Queen, for which Ranaut won her second national award, and especially now after Tanu weds Manu Returns, that could potentially help the girl from Himachal sweep all the popular acting awards, if not a third national award.

Where she seems to score is the way she gets under the skin of a character. In a double role here, one as the feisty, big-hearted and rebellious Tanu, we know from the prequel and the other as a rustic and upright Haryanvi girl who forms a love triangle with Manu; she does complete justice to both avatars with aplomb.

To get the mannerisms and especially the diction of another language flawlessly right (Haryanvi in this case), is a great achievement in itself considering that Priyanka Chopra struggled with the same in Mary Kom (Manipuri) and even Big B did not get it perfectly right in Piku(Bangla).

The other area where the film succeeds big time is humour; the comedy is really top class. The film belongs to Pappi (Deepak Dobriyal) in equal measure. He also carries the film on his shoulders with exceptional comic timing, expressions and dialogues. Dobriyal brings the house down again and again throughout the movie, even in very serious situations.

I have rarely laughed so much off late and his comedy would go down as one of the best post 2000 right up there with the likes of Paresh Rawal and Johny Lever. The rest of the supporting cast is also top class though one would feel that very good actors like Swara Bhaskar, Rajesh Sharma and Zeeshan Ayyub were a bit wasted.

The film is not without its flaws though. After an excellent first half, where one would not be able to bat an eyelid and would get stomach cramps laughing, the second half slows down a bit and becomes too predictable, though the brilliant acting and humour stills sees it through. The lecture on women issues and one of the songs in the second half were not really required. Some of the incidents shown are a bit over the top, but then we need to give some "cinematic liberty".

I give 5 stars for Kangana, Dobriyal, and the first half. Overall the movie gets 4 stars from me. 

Margarita with a Straw - A good watch, albeit the unusual subject and some flaws

“So what if your kid is Autistic. I heard they are very intelligent and he will become ‘alright’.”

“So what if you do not have kids? I know a great doctor, go to him. You can adopt also right?”

Our society is slowly becoming sensitive to people who are going through struggles in life or if they themselves or someone they love, have special needs. However often we try to be extra sympathetic without knowing the facts and may not understand that the way we choose to provide our support may actually hurt them.

They may not need that extra bit of sympathy or advice. We need to realize that more often than not, people do not want sympathy, which is sometimes synthetic in the first place. All they need is an effort to sincerely understand their situation and to be genuinely treated as equals.

“Margarita with a Straw” is an excellent attempt to show the life, the struggles and the coming of age of a girl with cerebral palsy and hits most of the right cords regarding the mental condition of such people, the overall attitude of their family and the society towards them.

Kalki as the protagonist Laila is par excellence. Due to her condition she has severe problems with her motor skills and speech, but she has enough talent otherwise and is passionate about music. She writes the lyrics for her college band and her emotions and desires are just like any other college going kid.

To get into such a character, the expressions, the mannerisms, the speech, the helplessness sometimes followed by the courage and the resilience, everything is perfect. A lot of effort goes into playing a character like that, so full marks for the same.

Revathy as the supportive mother is as seasoned an actress as ever. Her steel like supportive attitude towards her family, in spite of being a cancer patient, especially towards her daughter with special needs, even when she wants to go abroad to pursue higher education, her sadness within at times, has been excellently executed. Sayani Gupta as a blind girl, Laila’s friend and roommate Khanum also delivers a very good performance, as an important character in the plot.

Director Shonali Bose gets most things right with her story telling and she deserves kudos for making a movie on this subject. Realities like the society tries to understand such conditions, friends are helpful most of the times, people show sympathy, but then we are still not there yet completely have been portrayed very well. The middle finger to the senior lady at the music competition is an excellent scene for example.

The fact that the person with special needs would also have grey shades like any of us, would bargain for things, can be selfish and may subconsciously use people have been shown honestly. The idea that we all want to fit in and eventually realize that real happiness and contentment is found within our own selves has been driven through in a nice and subtle way.

Movie goers must encourage such subjects because they help people understand such conditions.

However the sensitive subject should not make one reluctant of having a critical view of all the aspects of the film. When I watch such movies I consider Dustin Hoffman’s “Rainman” and the Sanjeev Kumar, Jaya Bhaduri starrer “Koshish” as benchmarks.

Off late while most Hindi movies have been way off the mark in portraying characters with special needs, Taare Zameer Par is one bright exception. Priyanka Chopra’s depiction as an Autistic person in Barfi is also a good example.

Though the character building of the protagonist is top notch, the film does fail at some levels. It successfully portrays that the explorations and understanding of the self, the yearnings and desires of a person with a special condition is the same as other human beings. Understanding one’s sexuality is also a part of it. However it is just one part.

In the movie, the sexual aspect is too emphasized and by the end it becomes a bit of overkill. Other aspects like aspirations, the relationship with others and the struggles thereof, the other myriad facets of the journey called life are covered, but not in as much depth as they should have been.

Acceptance and sensitivity towards people with special needs is something we need to develop a lot more as a nation of people. Acceptance of gay relationships is another such issue. While I support both issues, mixing them in one movie seemed to shift the actual focus.

The other way to look at it might be that that the movie rightly does not educate or preach. It just shows the story of girl with cerebral palsy, who also happens to be bisexual.

It is a bit slow and on an unusual subject and hence may not do well at the box office. However it is a good watch, primarily due to the acting prowess of the leading ladies. The thin storyline and less than excellent screenplay prevent it from being the masterpiece it could have been.

Please do watch it for Kalki’s acting though, 3 stars out of 5 from me. 

Detective Byomkesh Bakshy: A different Satyanveshi, but must watch!!

One thing is certain, slowly but surely, Indian cinema is changing for the better.

We may not be right up there with the best as yet and we still produce lots of garbage masquerading as cinema, but when you watch a Hindi movie with no cringe worthy moments and you unabashedly compare it with good international movies in the same genre, things definitely are moving in the right direction.

This change is being led by directors like Dibakar Banerjee. Already having feathers like “Kholsa ka Ghosla” in his cap, Banerjee is a clear winner again in “Detective Byomkesh Bakshy” and delivers a stylish crime drama with aplomb.

The nostalgic or the purist, who were born and brought up with the cool and suave Rajat Kapoor in the Doordarshan series with the same name, or those that have a fixed idea of “Satyanveshi” in their minds through readings and depictions in other movies, may take time to accept Sushant Singh Rajput as the famous detective.

This depiction Byomkesh is arrogant initially, clearly has his human shortcomings and Rajput as an actor does not try hard to fit into any mould. This has its pros and cons.

While it is always advisable for an actor not to copy anyone and become one’s own character, one may ask how a Bengali babumoshai of Kolkata in the 1940s can have such impeccable Hindi with no mother tongue influence whatsoever and no real mannerisms of a young Bengali lad, ironically while every other character looked and behaved more Bengali. Others may feel would it have been better to cast someone like Rajkumar Rao as the protagonist.

Having said this and the above points apart, Rajput does make the most of it, honestly works hard, grows into the role and becomes very good by the climax.

Ajit contacts Byomkesh to find his father, a chemical scientist, who has gone missing. Byomkesh starts staying in the boarding house where Ajit’s father used to stay just before he went missing and starts unravelling the mystery along with Anukul Guha, the lodge owner.

The first story of Sharadindu Banerjee in the actual Byomkesh series starts in a hostel as well, in the backdrop of a couple of murders, but the similarity ends there. Unlike the actual “humble” Byomkesh stories that constitute theft, impersonation or a couple of murders at the most, involving domestic or local issues, the plot for this movie is like a huge canvass.

Highly complex, but makes sense as we are slowly able to join the dots. The overall plot includes the Second World War, the Kolkata bombings by Japan, powerful politicians and the opium mafia of China, alongside dead bodies and corpses found at every plot point.

The supporting cast is simply excellent. The character of Ajit is not what Sharadindu Banerjee wrote, but has been very well played by the ‘seasoned’ Anand Tiwari. Neeraj Kabi as the lodge owner is a revelation, excellent acting and we must see more of him in the future. Swastika Mukherjee who was the leading lady in the highly acclaimed and awarded Bengali movie “Jatishwar”, plays the role of a dangerous seductress to perfection. Meiyang Chang, Divya Menon as Satyavati, the other housemates and characters are competent.

If “Kahaani” showed contemporary Kolkata with finesse, Banerjee has been able to depict pre Independence Kolkata with mastery. The trams, the clutter, the beauty, the Howrah bridge, the British, the Japanese, the politicians of those times, all woven together in a gripping screenplay.

The cinematography is brilliant, the background music and songs add to the intense situations.

One cannot help but compare with movies like “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows”. Some of the scenes seem to be inspired by this Sherlock flick, sometimes during the build-up and during the climax. No one can accuse Banerjee of plagiarism though; this can be termed as positive influence because nothing has been lifted directly, except the presentation in some sequences.

Overall Banerjee scores because while Holmes was transformed into a James Bond in the said Hollywood movie braving cannons and missiles, Bakshy is still largely a "drawing room detective" in this one, solving complex situations and motives in his mind and waiting for that one elusive missing clue and then for his Eureka moment. As the director, Banerjee did the right thing to spice up and tweak the character to keep up with current audiences, while keeping the soul of the character intact.

The climax is a notch lower than the build-up and the final scenes that were put in only as a platform for the second part are a bit hammy.

I would wait for part 2 though, 4 stars for part one. 3.5 for the movie and 0.5 because we are making such movies! 

Interstellar - Must watch after a quick reading of Resnick Halliday

For the students who did not opt for Science during High School, understanding Interstellar could be a bit difficult, as for the others who did not take their Physics lessons seriously. I would recommend a 30 minute Google crash course on Relativity, Black Holes and Quantum Physics before heading for this one, because this is a movie that needs to be watched if you love sci-fi, since this could end up as one of the most creative movies in this genre.

Chrsitopher Nolan always has a grand vision and it is evident in the way the entire concept has been thought of. He has the capability of taking average movie goers out of their comfort zones and make them think and comprehend concepts they normally would not.

Somewhere in the future, there has been a "crop blight" that has reduced humanity to an existence where most people understand that the earth would soon be inhabitable, signaling the end of the human race. Among them is former astronaut, scientist and engineer Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) who now leads the life of a farmer with his son, daughter and father-in-law. The daughter played admirably by Mackenzie Foy, regularly witnesses certain activities in the small library in her room and says that there is a ghost in there, which she is not afraid of, since the ghost seems to be telling her something. Initially Cooper does not take her seriously, but later realizes that that signals from the book shelves provide them some coordinates.

These coordinates lead them to a secret NASA location, with a much cut down workforce, headed by Professor Brand(Michael Caine), who is known to Cooper. Brand says that since the earth would end in a few decades, there have been missions to check other planets, where the human beings could survive. They have been guided by some "alien information" to a wormhole that takes them to these planets that orbit around a black hole. Three of these planets have been found to be potentially habitable as per signals received from astronauts that went there 10 years back. 

There is a Plan A where if a planet is actually habitable, Brand would send the entire remaining human race there, through giant space shuttles that would move through gravity, the theory for which he is working on through a complex equation involving quantum physics, gravity and the speed of light. In case Plan A does not succeed, since the equation is not solved, Plan B is to plant freezed human fetuses into the habitable planet, through surrogacy and ensure that the human race lives on.

Cooper agrees to be the pilot for the spaceship Endurance along with Brand's daughter Amelia, two robots TARS and CASE and two more scientists. They soon realize that there is a huge time dilation in these planets and a few days or even hours spent in these planets would mean many years on the earth, so they stand a chance of never being able to meet their loved ones again and worse get back to the earth when the human race is already finished, that is if they ever go back to the earth, braving the severe challenges that lay ahead. 

The rest of the movie is a gripping account of travel to these planets, through worm holes and then through a black hole fused with very real human emotions on the spacecraft and back on earth. Owing to time dilation, Cooper's daughter Murphy has grown up and become an excellent scientist and joined Brand at NASA, yearning for her father to return. The climax is especially unexpected and incredible and if one is able to understand, one would be "Physics-cally" overwhelmed. Ever imagined how a multi-dimensional space-time curve would look?

The best thing about Hollywood movies is they are not overwhelmed by a great sci-fi script, they pay equal attention to other aspects of film making, including acting and human emotions as well. The acting of the main characters is excellent, neither hyper not understated, exactly how it should be, in a dying planet, in a spacecraft and so on. The emotional bond between father and daughter, the camaraderie of the astronauts is also very well depicted. Even the characters of the witty robots CASE and TARS have been so well developed, that one feels bad when TARS has to sacrifice itself to reduce weight in the spaceship. It however connects to Cooper during the climax.

The special effects are excellent. All the scenes, the spacecraft, the scenes in outer space, inside a black hole or other planets look very real. Though they look similar to another excellent movie off late, Gravity. At times some of the concepts also sound similar to other movies I have watched in this genre. 

I felt the movie at 169 minutes running time, was a bit long for a Hollywood movie, however except a few scenes you would never feel that it has been unnecessarily stretched. If you really understand Relativity, Black Holes and Quantum mechanics, there could be many question asked. For example, we see time dilation, but why is there no mass defect at speeds of light? Or for that matter, even light cannot escape a black hole, can a space craft and human beings inside really survive?

However this much "cinematic liberty" has to be given, especially since this is a well-made movie otherwise.

I would strongly recommend watching, and give it 4 stars out of 5.

 

Haider

First things first, "Haider" is among the best till now from the multi talented Vishal Bhardwaj, if not the best. And I say this knowing fully well that he has created other gems like "Omkara", "Ishqiya" and "Maqbool".

Technical things come later, for me the movie stands apart for its intensity, narrative and extremely good performances from almost all its main characters. Kay Kay Menon who would probably end up with the likes of Naseeruddin Shah, Anupam Kher and Om Puri by the time he hangs his boots, delivers yet another flawless performance as the antagonist.

Ambitous and slimy, lecherous and political, highly unethical, but with an excellent gift of the gab and warmth that convinces most people, Menon got under the skin of Bhardwaj's Claudius. There are very few people who can exactly play the director's character more than him. Just think of the other characters he played, Rudra Pratap Singh(Shaurya), Dukey Bana(Gulaal), Rakesh Maria(Black Friday) and you would know. Kay Kay is the most under rated actor of Bollywood and deserves much more recognition and respect.

And one of the most under rated actresses (since non actresses have hogged the limelight) is Tabu! It is sad that Bollywood has not been able to get more from her. Her character is of a woman who slipped, but has been misunderstood a lot more, who loves her son dearly, wants everything in life, but loses all.

The myriad thoughts, the conflicts of emotions in various situations, have been flawlessly portrayed by the peerless actress. Her different gazes and face expressions in difference situations is testimony to her prowess.

Tabu and Kay Kay have given many such great performances in the past, but as far as Shahid Kapoor is concerned, this is his best performance till date.

The character is very challenging and I think his hard work and his great father's genes helped him live up to the role with aplomb. He is very clam in the first half as is the demand of the character, with some burts of anger here and there, but he just owns the second half and matches up to acting powerhouses like Menon and Tabu.

The mood swings, the acting within the acting at times, the sarcastic one liners to his mother, all are superlative. The scene at a chowk as a satire on the establishment and the dialogues with Tabu and Menon stand out.

Television actor Narendra Jha plays the important part of Shahid Kapoor's father and a doctor very effectively. Shraddha Kapoor also tries sincerely and does her best as the protagonist's love interest. I thought one of the best actors of Bollywood, Irfan, was not required to play the role of "Roohgaar", but even in a special appearance he proves his mettle. Maybe Bhardwaj cannot do without him these days.

All other actors, play their parts competently. The two Salmans, based on Rosencrantz and Guildenstern of Shakespeare's Hamlet, provide comic relief in an otherwise poignant and tragic storyline.

Macbeth, Othello and now Hamlet, Vishal Bhardwaj could get a PhD on Shakespeare now! :)

The character building has to be appreciated which many directors fail to do. Things are not black and white, all of us have shades of grey and all the characters are consistent with this fact and do what seems right from each one's point of view. The script takes up the Kashmir issue and juxtaposes it with the Hamlet storyline very successfully. Like the characters, the Kashmir issue too has many points of view and lines blur when one honestly sits to decide right and wrong.

There have been many movies on Kashmir. As Indians we must support the Indian cause and our army and we do so. The Kashmir issue however in totality is very complex and as film maker one needs to capture it in its entirety, as per his honest understanding.

So when the army man says, "No terrorist dead or alive is worth my soldier's life", it is a very genuine feeling of a commanding officer, when a soldier from some part of India dies fighting terrorists in Kashmir to protect India's sovereignty. In the same way, innocent civilians who accidentally die in the cross fire of army and terrorists, or are arrested and tortured, also have their own painful stories and their families rightly feel aggrieved.

Though the Kashmir issue is only a sub plot, I think this is one movie which has been able to show things as is, without giving any judgement. Bhardwaj deserves credit for this too.

The cinematography, the picturesque Kashmir, the red blood on white snow for example, the unusual camera angles, the time given to the viewer for some of the scenes to sink in, together give the movie the look of an all time classic.

What may work against the movie though, are couple of songs at the wrong time, which were not required actually. I also felt that some sequences could have been shorter and overall the movie should have been 20 minutes shorter. We shall see whether this ends up as an all time classic.

For now, the movie gets 4.5 out of 5 from me!



 

The Chennai Express Phenomenon!

Not writing a formal review on "Chennai Express" because the movie is unbelievably crass and horrible, far worse than I thought.

Rohit Shetty is not known for making quality movies anyway, but at least his earlier movies had some form of comedy and entertainment. In this one there is not one scene that one could appreciate as real comedy and would remember. The intended humourous scenes fall flat on your face and are plain irritating. Stereotyping one community and overacting unnecessarily, really do not fall under any kind of comedy.

Shah Rukh Khan hams, overacts miserably and probably delivers his worst performance till date. After a horrible Ra One, an average Jab Tak Hai Jaan and then this one, SRK might be still earning money, but his standing as an actor and the quality of movies he stands for takes a severe beating. When he looks back, he would probably regret that with all the money and power he wielded, at this stage of his career, he could have made some real world class cinema that could have made Bollywood international in the true sense and taken Indian cinema to the next level.

Though nothing exceptional, Deepika Padukone tries her best and does deliver in her role of a Tamil girl, to an extent. The other actors, Deepika's "Don" father, rowdy cousins, fiance, are well cast, but they become a part of the terrible cacophony masquerading as cinema. The cinematography is good and Shetty is very good in showing long convoys of cars and then blowing them up!

Having said this there are two things we need to consider.

The first point is Shah Rukh Khan's business model.

So marketing and hype renders quality and content of cinema optional and unnecessary. The reviews are amazingly guarded during the first week and though no one says the movie is a class apart for obvious reasons, they also do not say that movie is pure garbage. By this time the marketing, the long Eid weekend among other things, ensures an earning of 150 crores at the box office. After the film has earned, the reviews now are pretty scathing.

So SRK's network and strategy has to be appreciated from a purely business point of view and he cannot be really blamed if it works for him.

The second point is on the Indian movie goer and his choice of films.

I can understand different people may like different genres and kinds of movies, all directors cannot be Satyajit Rays and some movies would be made just for entertainment and/or comedy. So for me "Munnabhai" was an example of pure entertainment and "Hera Pheri" was pure comedy. Does the Indian audience really not understand the difference between these and horrible cinema like Chennai Express?

How can Indians pay 150 crores for a movie like this, while quality cinema routinely bombs at the box office?  The saving grace is that movies like "Paan Singh Tomar", "Kahaani" and "Bhaag Milkha Bhaag" are also doing well, so there is some hope. The ideal situation would be when these movies make much more money than mindless movies like Chennai Express, but for that, the Indian movie goer has to mature big time!

I can be accused of being "cinematically snobbish" and then one can say something like "If the people accept something, it is good and successful." However the same logic is given by Indian politicians, after all it is again the people who choose them too, but can we be really be proud of the people who run our nation?

The larger problem is that success of movies like these, redefines the definition of "good cinema", so other film makers would follow this model since it is much easier to make a movie without a good script, direction and quality acting. So we can expect much more garbage to flow out of Bollywood.

So while India would remain a nation of corrupt politicians, it would also maintain its status of being a nation that makes the most movies, but very few that can take on the best in the world.